Conflicts of Interest

Live Webcast Of Mass. High Court Hearing on Patent Subject Matter Conflicts

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, Patent Ethics / By

The September 8, 2015, oral argument before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Maling v. Finnegan Henderson will be broadcast live by webcast. For those interested in watching the oral argument, which is scheduled to be held sometime between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM, click on the link at Mass. Supreme Judicial Court. As previously reported […]

Live Webcast Of Mass. High Court Hearing on Patent Subject Matter Conflicts Read More »

Law Firms Tell Mass. Supreme Court No Subject Matter Conflict In Patent Prosecution Unless Claims “Identical” Or “Mere Obvious Variants”

1 Comment / Conflicts of Interest, Malpractice, Patent Ethics, Patent Malpractice / By

On August 20, 2015, eleven law firms filed a joint amicus brief in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in Maling v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner.  In Maling, the Massachusetts high court requested amicus briefing on whether Finnegan Henderson’s concurrent representation of two different clients who were allegedly seeking patent protection at the

Law Firms Tell Mass. Supreme Court No Subject Matter Conflict In Patent Prosecution Unless Claims “Identical” Or “Mere Obvious Variants” Read More »

“Rising Star” Falls For Suspended Trademark Attorney

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, IP Ethics, PTO Ethics Rules, Trademark, USPTO Director Decisions / By

By all accounts, Jeremy Blackowicz is a fine trademark attorney with a long and bright future ahead. According to a recent version of his law firm’s website, Mr. Blackowicz was an associate in the Boston, Massachusetts intellectual property department of Day Pitney, LLP.  According to the firm’s website, Mr. Blackowicz, a 2001 graduate of Boston University

“Rising Star” Falls For Suspended Trademark Attorney Read More »

Delaware Court Disqualifies Patent Lit. Counsel For Conflict Of Interest

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, District Court Litigation, IP Ethics / By

On May 15, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware granted a defense motion disqualifying plaintiff’s counsel in a patent infringement action due to a former client conflict of interest. Innovative Memory Solutions, Inc. v. Micron Tech., Inc., No. 14-1480-RGA (D. Del. May 15, 2015) (order here). Innovative Memory Solutions, Inc. (“IMS”)

Delaware Court Disqualifies Patent Lit. Counsel For Conflict Of Interest Read More »

Mass. Sup. Ct. Schedules Oral Argument on Subject Matter Conflicts in Patent Prosecution

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, IP Ethics, Malpractice / By

How close is too close?  That is a question that has perplexed patent attorneys who prepare and prosecute patent applications for multiple clients in the same, or similar, fields of technology.  At least one state appeals court has decided to take this question head on. As previously reported in our January 2, 2015, posting, the Justices of

Mass. Sup. Ct. Schedules Oral Argument on Subject Matter Conflicts in Patent Prosecution Read More »

Massachusetts Supreme Court To Tackle Thorny Issue Of Subject Matter Conflicts In Patent Prosecution

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, IP Ethics, Malpractice / By

On December 26, 2014, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts issued the following Announcement in an appeal pending before the court: ANNOUNCEMENT: The Justices are soliciting amicus briefs. Whether, under Mass. R. Prof. C. 1.7, an actionable conflict of interest arose when, according to the allegations in the complaint, attorneys in different offices of the

Massachusetts Supreme Court To Tackle Thorny Issue Of Subject Matter Conflicts In Patent Prosecution Read More »

Sony Alleges Conflict Of Interest, Wants Acacia In-House And Outside Patent Litigation Counsel DQ’d

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, District Court Litigation, IP Ethics / By

Motions to disqualify opposing counsel are not uncommon, especially in patent litigation. In many cases, disqualification is sought based on an alleged former client conflict of interest. Former client disqualification motions normally allege that an attorney working in the law firm representing one of the parties to a litigation previously represented the opposing party in

Sony Alleges Conflict Of Interest, Wants Acacia In-House And Outside Patent Litigation Counsel DQ’d Read More »

Mega Firm Withdraws From Patent Infringement Suit After Former Client Alleges Conflict of Interest

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, Patent Litigation Ethics / By

On September 29, 2014, K&L Gates voluntarily withdrew as defendant’s counsel in a patent infringement action after the plaintiff asked a California federal district court to disqualify the Am Law 100 firm for a conflict of interest because the firm had previously represented the plaintiff regarding the same patents at issue in the litigation. See

Mega Firm Withdraws From Patent Infringement Suit After Former Client Alleges Conflict of Interest Read More »

Scroll to Top