District Court Tells IP Firm “Don’t Ask Alice,”Confirms $8 Million Malpractice Award For Bungling Patent Application

Michael E. McCabe, Jr.District Court Litigation, Malpractice, Patent Malpractice1 Comment

A federal judge in New York rejected an intellectual property firm’s attempt to rely on the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice decision as grounds to set aside a jury’s multi-million dollar verdict for mishandling a client’s patent application.  In denying post-trial motions, U.S. District Judge Pamela Chen ruled that Virginia law firm Antonelli Terry Sout & Kraus LLP forfeited its Section 101 defense because … Read More

USPTO Disciplines Attorney For Billing $1,000 Hourly “Relationship Fee”

Michael E. McCabe, Jr.Client Funds, Discipline, PTO Ethics Decisions2 Comments

The USPTO settled a disciplinary action filed against a non-patent attorney who billed a client thousands of dollars, at a rate of $1,000 per hour, to prepare a patent application and then, without his client’s knowledge or consent, outsourced the legal work to an unaffiliated patent attorney for a fraction of the fee paid by the client.   In re Lehat, No. D2013-04. This disciplinary action arose … Read More