IP Ethics

The Ethical Risks of Paraprofessionals Providing IP Legal Services (Part 1 of 2)

Leave a Comment / IP Ethics, OED, Office of Enrollment and Discipline, Unauthorized Practice of Law / By

“Individual commitment to a group effort–that is what makes a team work, a company work, a society work, a civilization work.” –Vince Lombardi Every successful IP lawyer, whether a solo practitioner or a senior partner in a mega-firm, has one thing in common: a great support team of secretaries, legal assistants, technical advisors, and paralegals. […]

The Ethical Risks of Paraprofessionals Providing IP Legal Services (Part 1 of 2) Read More »

“Rising Star” Falls For Suspended Trademark Attorney

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, IP Ethics, PTO Ethics Rules, Trademark, USPTO Director Decisions / By

By all accounts, Jeremy Blackowicz is a fine trademark attorney with a long and bright future ahead. According to a recent version of his law firm’s website, Mr. Blackowicz was an associate in the Boston, Massachusetts intellectual property department of Day Pitney, LLP.  According to the firm’s website, Mr. Blackowicz, a 2001 graduate of Boston University

“Rising Star” Falls For Suspended Trademark Attorney Read More »

State Bar Discipline Can Be Hazardous To IP Attorneys’ Right To Practice Before The USPTO (Part 2 of 2)

Leave a Comment / IP Ethics, Reciprocal Discipline, USPTO Director Decisions / By

This is the second of a two-part series on reciprocal discipline in the USPTO.  To read the first part click here. Once the notice requirements set forth in Sections 11.24(a) and (b) have been satisfied, Section 11.24(d) dictates the manner in which the disciplinary hearing shall proceed. In accordance with Section 11.24(d), “the USPTO Director shall

State Bar Discipline Can Be Hazardous To IP Attorneys’ Right To Practice Before The USPTO (Part 2 of 2) Read More »

Delaware Court Disqualifies Patent Lit. Counsel For Conflict Of Interest

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, District Court Litigation, IP Ethics / By

On May 15, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware granted a defense motion disqualifying plaintiff’s counsel in a patent infringement action due to a former client conflict of interest. Innovative Memory Solutions, Inc. v. Micron Tech., Inc., No. 14-1480-RGA (D. Del. May 15, 2015) (order here). Innovative Memory Solutions, Inc. (“IMS”)

Delaware Court Disqualifies Patent Lit. Counsel For Conflict Of Interest Read More »

State Bar Discipline Can Be Hazardous To IP Attorneys’ Right To Practice Before The USPTO (Part 1 of 2)

Leave a Comment / IP Ethics, Reciprocal Discipline, USPTO Director Decisions / By

Consider the following – a patent attorney is investigated and charged by her state bar for violating the state’s code of ethics.  The patent attorney believes her state law license is not particularly relevant or necessary because 100% of her practice is dedicated to patent prosecution.  Therefore, to make the state bar matter “go away” with

State Bar Discipline Can Be Hazardous To IP Attorneys’ Right To Practice Before The USPTO (Part 1 of 2) Read More »

USPTO Suspends Patent Attorney For Neglect, UPL And Failure To Cooperate

Leave a Comment / Discipline, IP Ethics, OED, Office of Enrollment and Discipline / By

On May 15, 2015, the USPTO Director issued an Order suspending Seattle, Washington-based patent and trademark attorney Nam D. Dao for six months for allowing multiple patent and trademark applications to go abandoned without client knowledge or consent, engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, and failing to cooperate with the Office of Enrollment and

USPTO Suspends Patent Attorney For Neglect, UPL And Failure To Cooperate Read More »

Mass. Sup. Ct. Schedules Oral Argument on Subject Matter Conflicts in Patent Prosecution

Leave a Comment / Conflicts of Interest, IP Ethics, Malpractice / By

How close is too close?  That is a question that has perplexed patent attorneys who prepare and prosecute patent applications for multiple clients in the same, or similar, fields of technology.  At least one state appeals court has decided to take this question head on. As previously reported in our January 2, 2015, posting, the Justices of

Mass. Sup. Ct. Schedules Oral Argument on Subject Matter Conflicts in Patent Prosecution Read More »

Scroll to Top