Office of Enrollment and Discipline

Bar Counsel Imposes Discipline For “Personal” Misconduct & Legal But Unethical Behavior

6 Comments / Patent Ethics, PTO Ethics Decisions, PTO Ethics Rules, USPTO Director Decisions, USPTO OED / By

Many members of the public, and some attorneys themselves, believe that if they do not lie, they do not steal, and they do not cheat, then their conduct necessarily complies with the Rules of Professional Conduct.  This is a false assumption.  Others believe that an attorney’s “transgressions” in her personal life will not affect her […]

Bar Counsel Imposes Discipline For “Personal” Misconduct & Legal But Unethical Behavior Read More »

State Bar Discipline Can Be Hazardous To IP Attorneys’ Right To Practice Before The USPTO (Part 2 of 2)

Leave a Comment / IP Ethics, Reciprocal Discipline, USPTO Director Decisions / By

This is the second of a two-part series on reciprocal discipline in the USPTO.  To read the first part click here. Once the notice requirements set forth in Sections 11.24(a) and (b) have been satisfied, Section 11.24(d) dictates the manner in which the disciplinary hearing shall proceed. In accordance with Section 11.24(d), “the USPTO Director shall

State Bar Discipline Can Be Hazardous To IP Attorneys’ Right To Practice Before The USPTO (Part 2 of 2) Read More »

USPTO Disbars Attorney For Engaging In Pattern Of Client Neglect, Deceit, And Misappropriation

Leave a Comment / Discipline, Patent Attorney Disciplinary Matters, PTO Ethics Decisions / By

Never lie, never cheat, never steal. – John Wooden Patent attorney Rodney K. Worrel should have listened to the sage advice of UCLA’s legendary basketball coach. The California-based attorney has been excluded from practice before the USPTO for engaging in a pattern of misconduct that involved multiple acts of neglect, deceit, and conversion of client

USPTO Disbars Attorney For Engaging In Pattern Of Client Neglect, Deceit, And Misappropriation Read More »

Scroll to Top